chilly

Random thoughts from Billy Chasen, founder of turntable.fm, artist, creator of things

Two philosophies

One of Facebook’s core philosophies is that a user’s privacy is paramount.  Part of that privacy is the data you create by browsing Facebook is never shown to other users.  You’ll never see a newsfeed story that says, “Joe viewed your profile 1,024 times.”  It’s that most basic line in the sand that has helped Facebook grow like it did.  It has allowed us to all breathe easily when we view people’s profiles, photos, timeline, etc.  We’ve all done it.  Maybe it’s a potential girlfriend or an ex-boyfriend or a stockpile of images from a party.  One of the most important parts of Facebook is that we can all browse it freely and without consequence.  When we decide to take an action such as commenting on a photo, it is then that we make ourselves known.  The simplest action being, I like this.

The current Facebook newsfeed is a whole different story.  It’s littered with things people have listened to, watched, read, and bought on other websites.  Many of my friends don’t realize these are showing up.  When I tell them they may not want, “Young girls dancing on the beach (via socialcam),” showing up, they are thankful and ask me how to delete it and stop it from happening again.  I had another friend read an article, “5 Weird Things That Make You Horny (via mens health).”  Even though she might be perfectly curious, it reads a bit differently when it’s on your newsfeed.  A user is free to turn these off, but the default is on and anyone who develops software knows that default is king.

These two philosophies are completely contrasting views of the world.  Facebook has for a long time been about explicit actions.  When they introduced a like button for websites, this was a great example of an explicit action.  I click a button and tell the world I like this page.  

The implicit version of this would be every website you view gets sent to Facebook and shows up in your feed.  It’s not hard to imagine how that would be received worldwide.  What is going on right now is the first step to that reality.  If Facebook is moving towards being a browser for external content it should treat itself like a browser.  You will never see Chrome post all your viewed websites to Google Plus.

Sites can grow virally without it.

Instagram is an example of doing it right.  They make it incredibly easy to post to twitter and Facebook.  I use this feature often.  Sometimes I choose to take a photo with Instagram simply because it’s the fastest way to get it onto my Facebook and twitter feeds.  But Instagram has never implicitly pushed these actions to external social networks and it certainly had no trouble growing.

When we launched turntable.fm, I also drew the line in the sand that we would only have explicit actions.  I received a lot of pressure from some advisors that we should be as spammy as possible because it works.  We grew fantastically well based simply on having a great idea and product and didn’t have to resort to it.  Then, like many other startups, I bent that rule when Facebook introduced the custom open graph.  It was a judgment call and came down to a belief that we had to do it to properly compete with everyone else doing it.  However, starting this week, new turntable users need to turn on implicit Facebook sharing in their settings.

Can it help sites grow?  Yes, but they are viewed as spammy and don’t need it if you build something great.

What’s so bad with implicit actions?

How our friends and peers view us is important to us all.  We all spend a lot of time filtering what we say, what we decide to do, who we decide to be with and where we decide to go.  We spend even more time deciding which of those actions we want to call public.  Implicit actions are a jarring change to this normal flow of how and when we decide to make ourselves public.

Implicit actions require you to behave differently.  Every time you do something that might potentially show up on Facebook, you have to think to yourself, do I want this to appear on Facebook?  You also need to think about who will see it.  Our network of friends is expanding into all parts of life and I am now friends with young cousins, coworkers, the person who cuts my hair, and various other people.  You may even have forgotten that you gave permissions to a specific website, visit a few months later and get something auto-posted to your timeline.  It’s also a complete mystery of when and what actions will get posted (the onus is on other sites to tell you, which they mostly never do).

Facebook isn’t the only service with implicit actions.  I love Path, but did not appreciate when it automatically posted to everyone that I woke up when I opened the app.  Path also shows when people viewed my profile (and when I view theirs).  Both of these implicit actions make me browse Path less than I normally would.

A solution

One of Zuck’s slides during the last F8 was a huge Facebook popup box requesting a user share their most current achievement (getting a mushroom) in Super Mario Brothers.  He wanted to fix the problem of constantly being asked by every app if they want to post to Facebook.  It’s definitely an issue, but implicit actions are not the correct fix.

There are a few steps that I think Facebook could take to fix this:

  • Make a social contract with all users that all browsing data will never be shared and posting will always be explicit (and bask in the collective sigh of relief across the world).
  • Make an API for one-click actions that do not require bulky popups.  This would be much like a Facebook like button, but something with a customizable action.
  • If Facebook must have implicit actions, make them all go into a holding pen somewhere on the site where users can then publish the ones they want (thereby turning them explicit).

The fix is not more user control over when we implicitly share (or by setting permissions to viewable ‘only by me’).  That only fixes the problem for myself.  It doesn’t fix the problem for my friends, family, and coworkers, many of which don’t realize there is a spyglass into their browsing habits.

2 years ago
  1. homesforsaleincoloradosprings reblogged this from billychasen
  2. awesomegadget reblogged this from billychasen
  3. michaelthegeek reblogged this from billychasen
  4. bingonightatthestripclub reblogged this from depechemoses
  5. maxengel reblogged this from billychasen and added:
    comparing implicit versus...sharing. I’d argue...shift from...
  6. tobyjoydigital reblogged this from billychasen
  7. struckbell reblogged this from jedsundwall
  8. jedsundwall reblogged this from billychasen
  9. nickgrossman reblogged this from billychasen
  10. pjthexdj reblogged this from billychasen
  11. bytonybrown reblogged this from billychasen
  12. mfuxd reblogged this from billychasen and added:
    Very well-written about Facebook’s implicit sharing (via billychasen)
  13. leoofborg reblogged this from billychasen and added:
    Interesting read, but I disagree with the premise. Facebook pays a lot of lip service to privacy, but only tweaks things...
  14. leenewton reblogged this from billychasen
  15. rudramakesmovie reblogged this from billychasen and added:
    yup.
  16. jrtierney3 reblogged this from billychasen
  17. tnlnyc reblogged this from billychasen
  18. peterrauh reblogged this from billychasen